In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paulo Freire discusses what he calls the saving money arrangement of instruction. In the saving money framework the understudy is viewed as an item in which the instructor must place data. The understudy has no duty regarding comprehension of any kind; the understudy should just retain or disguise what the educator lets him know or her. Paulo Freire was particularly contradicted to the managing an account framework. He contended that the managing an account framework is an arrangement of control and not a framework intended to effectively instruct. In the managing an account framework the instructor is intended to shape and change the conduct of the understudies, now and then in a way that nearly takes after a battle. The educator attempts to compel data down the understudy's throat that the understudy may not accept or think about.
This procedure in the end leads most understudies to loathe school. It additionally drives them to build up an obstruction and a contrary mentality towards learning as a rule, to the point where a great many people won't look for information except if it is required for a review in a class. Freire felt that the best way to have a genuine instruction, in which the understudies take part in insight, was to transform from the managing an account framework into what he characterized as issue presenting training. Freire depicted how an issue presenting instructive framework could work in Pedagogy of the Oppressed by saying, "Understudies, as they are progressively presented with issues identifying with themselves on the planet and with the world, will feel progressively tested and obliged to react to that test. Since they secure the test as interrelated to different issues inside a complete setting not as a hypothetical inquiry, the subsequent understanding will in general be progressively basic and along these lines always less alienated"(81). The instructive framework created by the Italian doctor and teacher Maria Montessori exhibits a tried and compelling type of issue presenting training that drives its understudies to build their longing to learn instead of restraining it.
Freire presents two noteworthy issues with the managing an account idea. The first is that in the managing an account idea an understudy isn't required to be intellectually dynamic. The understudy is intended to just remember and rehash data, not to comprehend it. This restrains the understudies' imagination, demolishes their enthusiasm for the subject, and changes them into aloof students who don't comprehend or accept what they are being instructed yet acknowledge and rehash it since they have no other alternative. The second and increasingly emotional outcome of the managing an account idea is that it gives a gigantic capacity to the individuals who pick what is being instructed to abuse the individuals who are obliged to learn it and acknowledge it. Freire clarifies that the issues lies in that the educator holds all the keys, has every one of the appropriate responses and does all the reasoning. The Montessori way to deal with training does the correct inverse. It influences understudies to do all the reasoning and critical thinking so they land at their own decisions. The instructors basically help control the understudy, however they don't tell the understudy what is valid or false or how an issue can be illuminated.
In the Montessori framework, regardless of whether an understudy figures out how to take care of an issue that is slower or less powerful than a standard mechanical method for taking care of the issue, the educator won't intercede with the understudy's procedure since along these lines the understudy figures out how to discover arrangements without anyone else's input or herself and to consider innovative approaches to take a shot at various issues.
The instructive framework in the United States, particularly from review school as far as possible of secondary school, is practically indistinguishable to the saving money way to deal with training that Freire portrayed. Amid secondary school the majority of what understudies do is sit in a class and take notes. They are then reviewed on how well they complete homework and ventures lastly they are tried to demonstrate that they can duplicate or utilize the information which was instructed. More often than not the understudies are just receptors of data and they take no part in the formation of information. Another manner by which the U.S. instruction framework is for all intents and purposes indistinguishable to the keeping money arrangement of training is the reviewing framework. The evaluations of understudies for the most part reflect the amount they consent to the instructor's thoughts and the amount they are happy to pursue headings. Evaluations reflect accommodation to power and the ability to do what is told more than they mirror one's insight, enthusiasm for the class, or comprehension of the material that is being instructed. For example, in an administration class in the United States an understudy who does not concur that an agent popular government is better than some other type of government will do more awful than an understudy who just acknowledges that a delegate majority rules system is superior to an immediate vote based system, communism, socialism, or another type of social framework. The U.S. training framework remunerates the individuals who concur with what is being educated and rebuffs the individuals who don't.
Besides, it disheartens understudies from addressing and doing any reasoning of their own. In view of the dreary and characterless nature of our instruction framework, most understudies loathe secondary school, and in the event that they do well on their work, it is just to obtain a review rather than learning or investigating another thought.
The Montessori Method advocates youngster based instructing, giving the understudies a chance to take control of their own training. In E.M Standing's The Montessori Revolution in Education, Standing says that the Montessori Method "is a technique dependent on the rule of opportunity in a readied environment"(5). Concentrates done on two gatherings of understudies of the ages of 6 and 12 looking at the individuals who learn in a Montessori to the individuals who learn in a standard school condition demonstrate that in spite of the Montessori framework having no evaluating framework and no required remaining task at hand, it does just as the standard framework in both English and sociologies; however Montessori understudies improve in arithmetic, sciences, and critical thinking. The Montessori framework takes into account understudies to almost certainly investigate their interests and interest openly. In view of this the Montessori framework pushes understudies toward the dynamic quest for information for joy, implying that understudies will need to learn and will get some answers concerning things that premium them just on the grounds that it is enjoyable to do as such.
Maria Montessori began to create what is presently known as the Montessori Method of training in the mid twentieth century.
The Montessori Method centers around the relations between the youngster, the grown-up, and the earth. The tyke is viewed as a person being developed. The Montessori framework has an inferred idea of giving the youngster a chance to be what the tyke would normally be. Montessori trusted the standard instruction framework makes kids lose numerous infantile characteristics, some of which are viewed as ethics. In Loeffler's Montessori in Contemporary American Culture, Loeffler states that "among the attributes that vanish are not just messiness, defiance, sloth, voracity, selfishness, contentiousness, and flimsiness, yet additionally the supposed 'innovative creative ability', thoroughly enjoy stories, connection to people, play, accommodation, etc". As a result of this apparent loss of the kid, the Montessori framework attempts to empower a kid to normally create self-assurance just as the capacity and eagerness to effectively look for information and discover one of a kind answers for issues by deduction imaginatively. Another vital distinction in how youngsters learn in the Montessori framework is that in the Montessori framework a kid has no characterized vacancy in which to play out an assignment. Rather the youngster is permitted to play out an undertaking for whatever length of time that he needs. This leads youngsters to have a superior ability to focus and concentrate on a solitary errand for an all-inclusive timeframe than kids have in the standard training framework.
The job which the grown-up or educator has in the Montessori framework denotes another central distinction between the Montessori s Method and the standard training framework. With the Montessori Method the grown-up isn't intended to always instruct and arrange the understudy. The grown-up's main responsibility is to direct the kid with the goal that the tyke will keep on pursueing his interests and build up his or her own ideas of what is genuine, right, and genuine. Montessori portrays the kid as a person in extreme, steady change. From perception Montessori reasoned that whenever permitted to create without anyone else's input, a youngster would dependably discover balance with his condition, which means he would learn not to abuse others, for instance, and to communicate decidedly with his friends. This is vital on the grounds that it prompts one of the Montessori Method's most profound situated thoughts, which is that grown-ups ought not let their quality be felt by the youngsters. This implies in spite of the fact that a grown-up is in the earth with the understudies, the grown-up does not really interface with the understudies except if the understudies ask the grown-up an inquiry or demand help. Moreover, the grown-up must influence it with the goal that the understudies to don't feel like they are being watched or made a decision in any capacity. The grown-up can make proposals to the youngsters, however never arranges them or guides them or how to do it. The grown-up must not be felt as an expert figure, but instead nearly as another companion of the kids.
The outcome of this, of course, is that significantly less 'work' completes by the understudies. All things considered, the understudies' improvement is significantly preferable in the Montessori framework over in a standard instruction framework. Be that as it may, by what method can understudies who have no commitment to do any work perhaps contend with understudies who are educated in the standard framework and do considerably more work in class and at home? I trust the appropriate response lies in that while understudies educated in the standard way are always being pushed towards loathing school and doing things mechanically without truly contemplating it, Montessori understudies are directed to effectively investigate their interests and appreciate doing as such. Moreover, Montessori understudies are always occupied with discernment.....!
0 coment�rios: